INOD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Pegasystems has a net margin of 17.4% compared to Innodata's net margin of 17.96%. Innodata's return on equity of 75.22% beat Pegasystems's return on equity of 39.42%.

Innodata has a consensus price target of $70.20, signalling upside risk potential of 102.77%. On the other hand Pegasystems has an analysts' consensus of $101.12 which suggests that it could grow by 8.64%. Given that Innodata has higher upside potential than Pegasystems, analysts believe Innodata is more attractive than Pegasystems.

Innodata has a beta of 2.751, which suggesting that the stock is 175.146% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pegasystems has a beta of 1.138, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.811%.

Innodata has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pegasystems offers a yield of 0.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Innodata pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pegasystems pays out 10.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Pegasystems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Innodata quarterly revenues are $59.2M, which are smaller than Pegasystems quarterly revenues of $475.6M. Innodata's net income of $10.3M is lower than Pegasystems's net income of $85.4M. Notably, Innodata's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.75x while Pegasystems's PE ratio is 45.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innodata is 6.35x versus 5.27x for Pegasystems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LiveRamp Holdings has a net margin of 17.4% compared to Innodata's net margin of 5.74%. Innodata's return on equity of 75.22% beat LiveRamp Holdings's return on equity of 0.01%.

Innodata has a consensus price target of $70.20, signalling upside risk potential of 102.77%. On the other hand LiveRamp Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $36.71 which suggests that it could grow by 30.29%. Given that Innodata has higher upside potential than LiveRamp Holdings, analysts believe Innodata is more attractive than LiveRamp Holdings.

Innodata has a beta of 2.751, which suggesting that the stock is 175.146% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LiveRamp Holdings has a beta of 1.018, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.828%.

Innodata has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LiveRamp Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Innodata pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LiveRamp Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Innodata quarterly revenues are $59.2M, which are smaller than LiveRamp Holdings quarterly revenues of $195.4M. Innodata's net income of $10.3M is lower than LiveRamp Holdings's net income of $11.2M. Notably, Innodata's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.75x while LiveRamp Holdings's PE ratio is 2,818.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innodata is 6.35x versus 2.60x for LiveRamp Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NCR Voyix has a net margin of 17.4% compared to Innodata's net margin of -2.76%. Innodata's return on equity of 75.22% beat NCR Voyix's return on equity of 183.3%.

Innodata has a consensus price target of $70.20, signalling upside risk potential of 102.77%. On the other hand NCR Voyix has an analysts' consensus of $13.63 which suggests that it could grow by 28.9%. Given that Innodata has higher upside potential than NCR Voyix, analysts believe Innodata is more attractive than NCR Voyix.

Innodata has a beta of 2.751, which suggesting that the stock is 175.146% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NCR Voyix has a beta of 1.531, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.078%.

Innodata has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NCR Voyix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Innodata pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NCR Voyix pays out 1.57% of its earnings as a dividend. NCR Voyix's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Innodata quarterly revenues are $59.2M, which are smaller than NCR Voyix quarterly revenues of $617M. Innodata's net income of $10.3M is higher than NCR Voyix's net income of -$17M. Notably, Innodata's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.75x while NCR Voyix's PE ratio is 1.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innodata is 6.35x versus 0.53x for NCR Voyix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zvelo has a net margin of 17.4% compared to Innodata's net margin of --. Innodata's return on equity of 75.22% beat Zvelo's return on equity of --.

Innodata has a consensus price target of $70.20, signalling upside risk potential of 102.77%. On the other hand Zvelo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Innodata has higher upside potential than Zvelo, analysts believe Innodata is more attractive than Zvelo.

Innodata has a beta of 2.751, which suggesting that the stock is 175.146% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zvelo has a beta of 0.130, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.987%.

Innodata has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zvelo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Innodata pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zvelo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Innodata quarterly revenues are $59.2M, which are larger than Zvelo quarterly revenues of --. Innodata's net income of $10.3M is higher than Zvelo's net income of --. Notably, Innodata's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.75x while Zvelo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innodata is 6.35x versus -- for Zvelo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.